Global SEM Costs Part 2

LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

 

Chris Jones

Author: Chris Jones, Independent Multichannel Retail Consultant

 

Comparing Countries?

 

In a previous article I took a look at the effectiveness of comparing SEM costs from one country to the next, as part of the budgeting/planning process of considering whether to localise your e-commerce offer for a particular new country.

 

In that article, I explored using global brand-names as a possible methodology for doing so, as a way of eliminating language bias from the comparisons. The results were fairly reasonable, but the suspicion remains that, even if language was eliminated as an issue, cultural bias – the relative popularity of brands around the globe – still skewed the results.

 

In this follow up article, I take a look at an alternative method, one that is probably closer to how most retailers might actually tackle the issue in reality, which uses generic terms instead of brand terms.

 

Methodology: using global online retailers

 

There are a small number of retailers whose proposition is, deliberately, very consistent across the multiple geographies in which they operate. IKEA is one such. However an exploration of their international sites, at least in languages I can read, reveals a surprising amount of difference in the website taxonomies. Moreover, I suspect that the majority of retailers considering taking their e-commerce international are not likely to be selling furniture.

 

A reasonable alternative is another Swedish retailer that’s gone global: H&M. A look at the “Ladies” section of their site suggests that it is very consistently structured across all the 61 countries in which they are operating. Moreover, even the non-transactional countries seem to have pretty much the same taxonomy. (There are evidently 2 slightly different releases of the site running globally):

 

H&M SEO Keywords

 

This suggests another methodology for comparing SEM costs, which in contrast to using branded terms, uses generic terms: simply take the second-level taxonomy from H&M’s site around the world and, once again, use the Google Keyword Planning tool to compare costs. This should have the advantage that not only has someone else pre-solved the translation issue for us, but the terms should be relatively free of cultural bias too – a shirt is consistently a shirt everywhere.

 

(Note that I have additionally separate terms such as “Jackets & Coats” into two separate terms “Jackets”, “Coats”; I wouldn’t like to swear in court to the precision with which I achieved this task in Japanese, although it was fairly simple in most other languages.)

Results

 

Before showing the graphs, I should note that of course there will still be some bias: coats are likely to be less popular in hot countries for example, and I have a sneaking suspicion that only the British wear socks. By once again weighting the averages according to the popularity of the search terms, I hope to have minimised this bias. There’s also a small secondary advantage from using a Swedish retailer: their original taxonomy will have been designed in Swedish, which removes the skew-to-English generally inherent this approach.

So what does it show?

 

H&M Ladieswear weighted average prices

 

I suspect the apparent cheapness of Japan, Korea and probably Russia reflect the fact the Google is not the dominant search engine in those countries. However in the case of Korea, especially, there is a suspicion that this may be compounded by H&M making a poor job of translation – the search volumes identified by Google are surprisingly low in a country where they do have at least a 9% share. (The H&M site is not transactional in Korea, so they maybe haven’t put too much effort into optimisation.) As an aside, retailers localising their sites might want to make use of the relative popularity of the translated terms they choose as a sanity check on the translations.

 

Elsewhere we see a macro-trend: from an SEM efficiency perspective, English language countries are much tougher than European countries. This might be another helpful factor when attempting to justify the costs of translation: not only will conversion rates probably improve, and SEO definitely improve, but it may be cheaper than expected to drive visitors directly via paid methods.

Comparison: branded vs generic

Comparing the approach from the previous article, focussing on international brands such as Nike, Samsung or Lego, with this one focussing on translated menu items such as Jackets, Trousers or Shirts, we see the following:

 

SEM Costs - branded vs generic SEO terms

 

Pleasingly the results are pretty consistent between the two methods. I’d conjecture that the major inconsistencies can be explained as follows:

 

Belgium and Italy: e-commerce is surprisingly immature compared to general use of the internet. Searches for branded terms are inherently more likely – and therefore expensive – as online research is more prevalent than online shopping. Note that the generic results for Belgium were based only on Dutch, which probably also affects the data (and possibly contributes to the opposite effect appearing for NL).

 

Korea, Russia and UAE: possible poor translation by H&M. In Russia there is also the likelihood that internet users are much more likely to be searching for international brands, which may well be the explanation for the UAE also.

Conclusions

The overall conclusions from these two studies (see also ‘Global SEM Costs’) suggest that:

  1. Comparing Google estimated traffic is a good way of validating your choice of menu taxonomy terms: is this really a word that the locals use?
  2. France is an anomaly. If anyone can suggest some reason why France seems to be surprisingly cheap for SEM in both these studies – it is, after all, a Google country – then it would be interesting to understand it further. (The results are in fact inexplicably inconsistent with my personal experience).
  3. There may be some interesting opportunities in less-developed countries to grab customers cheaply.
  4. There may also be opportunities in countries where Google has a moderate, but non-zero share, such as Japan, Korea or Russia.
  5. SEM marketing in English speaking countries is expensive!

 

LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

Royal Mail Sponsor

Register today for unlimited article views, and unique insights

Register Now

Connectivity and online behaviour in Canada

Connectivity and online behaviour in Canada

With typical online behaviour similar to other western counties, the Canadian eCommerce market can be seen as very appealing to cross-border retail. Exploring its sophisticated infrastructure, this article looks at the details of Canadian shoppers’ behaviour online, and examines some of the demographic nuances in internet access, online activity, and device preferences.
Online retail payment methods in Canada

Online retail payment methods in Canada

In different markets, shoppers can have varying preferences when it comes to making payments for orders on eCommerce sites. Canada is no exception but happily, there is more of an opportunity than a challenge when it comes to online retail payment in Canada. This article looks at the online retail payment methods within the Canadian eCommerce market.
Online shopping behaviour in Canada

Online shopping behaviour in Canada

When Canadian Shoppers buy online, how do they go about it, and what do they buy? With the use of mobile growing and the use of various devices for online shopping looking similar to trends in the UK, Canadian eCommerce has been a sleeping giant, but it’s waking up. And quickly. This article looks at the online shopping behaviour of the Canadian eCommerce market.
Online Retail Logistics in Canada

Online Retail Logistics in Canada

How should you go about planning your logistics strategy for servicing the Canadian eCommerce market and what are the options available? Canada is a spectacular 9,306 km from extreme east to extreme west so for any non-Canadian retailer looking for delivery partners to ship into the country, only large players with the scale to cover such a geography are particularly relevant. This article looks at the online retail logistics within Canada and how this impacts its eCommerce market.
5 tips for breaking into online retail in France

5 tips for breaking into online retail in France

France boasts being the 5th largest eCommerce market in the world and with an expectation to exceed €80 billion turnover in 2017, for those looking to enter this thriving online market here are five tips that could help you to break into the French online retail space.
Five things we learned at the eCommerce Worldwide Cross-Border Summit 2017

Five things we learned at the eCommerce Worldwide Cross-Border Summit 2017

On the 24th May 2017, we hosted our third annual Cross-Border Summit at the ExCeL London. Delegates from retailers and solution providers across the globe came to hear and share the latest insight on cross-border trading. But what were the key takeaways from the day?
2020 Vision: Spring provides route to ‘Destination Benelux’

2020 Vision: Spring provides route to ‘Destination Benelux’

With more than 28 million citizens between them, Belgium and the Netherlands are among the fastest-growing eCommerce markets when it comes to cross-border purchases meaning that they have rocketed up the rankings for attractiveness to retailers.
Entering the Emerging Markets of Latin America: Strategy Essentials

Entering the Emerging Markets of Latin America: Strategy Essentials

Latin America is a target market region for many business looking to expand globally. Brazil and Mexico are undeniable growth markets and the rest of Latin America (LATAM) is welcoming internet, social media, and eCommerce with open arms.
Interview with Melanie Smallwood, International Buying Director at Global Fashion Group

Interview with Melanie Smallwood, International Buying Director at Global Fashion Group

eCommerce Worldwide Cross-Border Summit 2017 - Ahead of our annual event on 24th May, we interview Melanie Smallwood, International Buying Director at Global Fashion Group, to learn from her experience and knowledge in cross-border trading around the world.
Interview with Gregor McMillan, Business Development, China at The Hut Group

Interview with Gregor McMillan, Business Development, China at The Hut Group

eCommerce Worldwide Cross-Border Summit 2017 - Ahead of our annual event on 24th May, we interview Gregor McMillan, Business Development, China at The Hut Group, to learn from his experience and knowledge in cross-border trading into China.

Contact Us

eCommerce Worldwide
2 Ching Court
49-53 Monmouth St
London
WC2H 9EY

Tel: 0203 696 0980
2016© eCommerce Worldwide

Keep In Touch

powered by Affino

About eCommerce Worldwide

eCommerce Worldwide provides online retailers with all the information, and resources, they need to develop cross-border strategies for entering new markets around the world
Read More